Articles

“How Is It with the Nothing?” Ferdinand Ulrich’s Thomistic Response to Heidegger

Rachel M. Coleman

Abstract

Rachel M. Coleman examines Heidegger’s notion of das Nichts in What is Metaphysics?, where asking “How is it with the nothing?” serves as the proper occasion for metaphysics. It contrasts Heidegger’s view, in which the nothing nihilates beings and obstructs their disclosure, with Ferdinand Ulrich’s Thomistic response in Homo Abyssus, where created beings, grounded in non-subsisting esse, reveal themselves inexhaustibly. Ulrich recasts nothingness as enabling, rather than obstructing, the encounter with the depth and gift of being.

Citations

Thomas, Summa contra Gentiles 1.26.5, “Multo igitur minus et ipsum esse commune est aliquid praeter omnes res existentes nisi in intellectu solum”: “Much less is esse commune itself something beyond all existing things—except in the intellect.”

Katherine Withy, Heidegger on Being Uncanny (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).

Martin Heidegger, Pathmarks, trans. Walter Kaufmann, 278.

Martin Bieler, introduction to Homo Abyssus, xvii–xviii.

De potentia 1.1

Heidegger, Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. Gregory Fried and Richard Polt (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000), 8.

Summa contra Gentiles 2.52.5

Summa contra Gentiles 2.52.4

Stephan Käufer, “The Nothing and the Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s What is Metaphysics?” (in Inquiry 48, no. 6 [August 2006]: 482–506).

John W.M. Krummel, “On (the) Nothing: Heidegger and Nishida,” in Continental Philosophy Review 51 (May 2017): 239–68, at 241.

Homo Abyssus, 38.

de la Tour, Gabe im Anfang, ch. 3, “Sein als reine Vermittlung,” 59–150.

Homo Abyssus: Das Wagnis der Seinsfrage (Eisiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1998), 15.

Judith Wolfe, Heidegger and Theology (New York: Bloomsbury, 2014), esp. chap. 1, “Heidegger’s Catholicism (1889–1915).”

Josef Pieper, The Silence of St. Thomas, trans. John Murray, SJ, and Daniel O’Connor (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 1999), 60.

Gerard Manley Hopkins, God’s Grandeur: “nature is never spent; / There lives the dearest freshness deep down things (27).” Gerard Manley Hopkins: Poems and Prose (New York: Penguin Classics, 1985).

Ulrich, Homo Abyssus (2, 17, 38).

Ulrich, Sein und Materie. Inwiefern ist die Konstruktion der Substanzkonstitution maßgebend für die Konstruktion der Materiebegriffes bei Suárez, Duns Scotus und Thomas?

John F. Wippel, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000), 80.

Timaeus (trans. Benjamin Jowett, in The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns [New Haven, Princeton University Press, 1961]) 29e

Thomas, The Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas [New York: J.F. Wagner, 1939], trans. Joseph B. Collins.

Ulrich, Homo Abyssus: The Drama of the Question of Being, trans. D.C. Schindler (Washington, DC: Humanum Academic Press, 2018).

D.C. Schindler, The Catholicity of Reason (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013), esp. chap. 7, “Giving Cause to Wonder,” 163–228.

Basic Questions of Philosophy: Selected “Problems” of “Logic”, 173.

“Thinking the ‘Nothing’ of Being: Ferdinand Ulrich on Transnihilation,” Communio 46, no.1 (2019): 182–98.

John R. Betz, "After Heidegger and Marion: The Task of Christian Metaphysics Today," Modern Theology 34, no. 4 (October 2018): 565–97.

Homo Abyssus, especially “The World of Man and Man as Normative Pattern for the Cosmos,” 373–408.

Oster, Mit-Mensch-Sein, esp. 332–365.

Erik van Versendaal, “Plenitudo Fontalis: Love’s Groundless Yes and the Grateful Originality of Nature,” Communio 46, no. 1 (2019): 134–81.

Heidegger’s Ways, trans. John W. Stanley [Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994], 45, 46

German Philosophy Since Kant, ed. Anthony O’Hear [New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999], 271

Stefan Oster, Mit-Mensch-Sein: Phänomenologie und Ontologie der Gabe bei Ferdinand Ulrich (Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 2004), 209–85.

Marine de la Tour, Gabe im Anfang: Grundzüge des metaphysischen Denkens von Ferdinand Ulrich (Munich: Verlag Kohlhammer, 2016), 59–150.

Stefan Oster, “Thinking Love at the Heart of Things: The Metaphysics of Being as Love in the Work of Ferdinand Ulrich,” trans. Adrian J. Walker, Communio 37, no. 4 (2010): 660–700.

D.C. Schindler, A Companion to Homo Abyssus (Baltimore: Humanum Academic Press, 2019), ch. 2, “The Perfection of Being Manifest in the Finite Creature” (21–48).

Marine de la Tour, “The Light of Gift in Homo Abyssus,” Communio 46, no. 1 (2019): 27–40, 29–32.

Ian Alexander Moore, “Science, Thinking, and the Nothing as Such: On the Newly Discovered Version of Heidegger’s ‘What is Metaphysics?’” in The Review of Metaphysics 72, no. 3 (March 2019): 529–62, at 541

“What is Metaphysics?,” trans. David Farrell Krell, in Pathmarks, ed. William McNeill (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 82