Articles

The ‘Scandal of Particularity’ and Blondel’s Philosophy of History

Cathal Doherty, SJ

Abstract

Cathal Doherty, SJ, examines Blondel’s philosophy of history in light of the “scandal of particularity,” the tension between historical particularity and universal significance in Christian revelation. Doherty argues that Blondel situates human action, rather than abstract thought, at the center of philosophy, showing that the supernatural gift requires concrete human participation. Historical particulars, ecclesial tradition, and sacramental practice are thus indispensable mediators of divine revelation. The scandal of particularity, far from a problem, emerges as a philosophical and theological necessity.

Citations

Maurice Blondel, Carnets intimes (1883–1894), (Cerf, 1961), 23, cited in James Somerville, Total Commitment: Blondel’s “L’Action” (Corpus, 1968), 7.

Kant, Religion Within the Bounds of Human Reason, §174, pp. 193–94

Immanuel Kant, Religion Within the Bounds of Human Reason, trans. Werner S. Pluhar (Hackett, 2009).

Cathal Doherty, Maurice Blondel on the Supernatural in Human Action: Sacrament and Superstition, (Brill 2017), 25–39.

Maurice Blondel, Philosophical Exigencies of Christian Religion, trans. Oliva Blanchette (University of Notre Dame, 2021), 45.

Maurice Blondel, Action (1893), trans. Oliva Blanchette (University of Notre Dame, 1984).

Francis F. Callahan, “Philosophical Method in Maurice Blondel” (PhD diss., Fordham University, 1956), 8–9

Gerhard Kittel, “The Jesus of History,” in Mysterium Christi: Christological Studies by British and German Theologians, ed. Gerhard Kittel, George Kennedy Allen Bell, and Gustav Adolf Deissman (Longmans, Green, 1930), 31–49

James Le Grys, “The Christianization of Modern Philosophy According to Maurice Blondel,” Theological Studies 54 (1993): 455–84, at 480.

Gotthold Lessing, “On the Proof of the Spirit and of Power,” in Lessing’s Theological Writings, ed. Henry Chadwick (Stanford University Press, 1957), 51–56.

Cathal Doherty, Maurice Blondel on the Supernatural in Human Action: Sacrament and Superstition (Brill Academic, 2017), 17–19.

Maurice Blondel, L’Itinéraire philosophique de Maurice Blondel: propos recueillis par Frédéric Lefèvre, ed. Frédéric Lefèvre (Aubier Montaigne, 1966), 35–36.

Maurice Blondel, “La tâche de la philosophie d’après la philosophie de l’action,” Annales de philosophie chrétienne 153 (1906): 50.

Maurice Blondel, “Le point de départ de la recherche philosophique”, Annales de philosophie chrétienne, 151 & 152 (1906): 337-60; 225-50 (340).

Marie-Dominique Chenu, “Le plan de la somme théologique,” Revue thomiste 47 (1939): 93–107.

Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, vol. 48, ed. R. J. Hennessey (Cambridge University Press, 1975), xv–xx.

Jacqueline Mariña, “Kant on Grace: A Reply to his Critics,” Religious Studies 33 (1997): 379–400.

Chris L. Firestone and Stephen R. Palmquist, ed., Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion (Indiana University Press, 2006).

Chris L. Firestone and Nathan Jacobs, ed., In Defense of Kant’s Religion (Indiana University Press, 2008).

Maurice Blondel, La Philosophie et l’esprit chrétien, tome II: Conditions de la symbiose seule normale et salutaire (Presses Universitaires de France, 1946), x

The Letter on Apologetics & History and Dogma, trans. Alexander Dru and Illtyd Trethowan (Eerdmans, 1994), 168.

Oliva Blanchette, Maurice Blondel: A Philosophical Life (Eerdmans, 2010), 233.

René Virgoulay, “La méthode d’immanence et l’encyclique Pascendi: incidences de la crise moderniste sur la pensée blondélienne,” Recherches de Science Religieuse 58 (1970): 429–54.

Maurice Blondel, Catholicisme social et Monophorisme (Bloud, 1910), 115.

Maurice Blondel, “Aspects actuels du problème philosophique de la transcendance et conception rationnelle du surnaturel,” in L’Action II: l’Action humaine et les conditions de son aboutissement (Presses Universitaires de France, 1937), 513–30.

“Human Perfection as Assimilation to God: Beatitude in the Light of the Philosophy of Maurice Blondel” (PhD diss., Boston College, 1993).

Yves Congar, Tradition and Traditions: A Historical and a Theological Essay (Macmillan, 1967), 362.

M.-Bernard Allo, “Extrinsécisme et historicisme,” Revue thomiste 12 (1904): 437–65.

Søren Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to “Philosophical Fragments,” ed. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong (Princeton University Press, 1992), 217ff.

Georg F.W. Hegel, “The Positivity of the Christian Religion,” in Early Theological Writings, trans. T. M. Knox (University of Chicago Press, 1948), 67–118.

Maurice Blondel, L’Action, Tome II, L’Action humaine et les conditions de son aboutissement (Alcan, 1937), 513–4, at 524.